AMD’s $429 twelve-core Ryzen 9 7900, $329 eight-core Ryzen 7 7700, and $229 six-core Ryzen 5 7600 come to market as the primary ‘Non-X’ Ryzen fashions for the corporate’s new AM5 platform for Zen 4 processors. As we have seen with AMD’s previous-gen lower-power fashions, these 65W fashions provide the identical core counts and cache as their full-fledged X-series counterparts however include decrease clock speeds and a lower cost level.
After overclocking, the 65W fashions have a tendency to supply practically the identical efficiency because the costlier ‘X’ fashions, just like the 7900X, 7700X, and 7600X, thus offering a less-expensive choice for lovers. AMD even throws in a bundled cooler with these chips, sweetening the deal because it appears to enhance its rankings on the checklist of the Greatest CPUs for gaming and its price-to-performance ratio in our CPU benchmark hierarchy.
| Header Cell – Column 0 | Road/MSRP | Cores / Threads (P+E) | P-Core Base / Increase Clock (GHz) | Cache (L2/L3) | TDP / PBP / MTP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 9 7900X | $474 ($549) | 12 / 24 | 4.7 / 5.6 | 76MB (12+64) | 170W / 230W |
| Ryzen 9 7900 | $429 | 12 / 24 | 3.7 / 5.3 | 76MB (12+64) | 65W / 88W |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | $349 ($399) | 8 /16 | 4.5 / 5.4 | 40MB (8+32) | 105W / 142W |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | $329 | 8 / 16 | 3.8 / 5.3 GHz | 40MB (8+32) | 65W / 88W |
| Ryzen 5 7600X | $249 ($299) | 6 / 12 | 4.7 / 5.3 | 38MB (6+32) | 105W / 142W |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | $229 | 6 / 12 | 3.8 / 5.1 GHz | 38MB (6+32) | 65W / 88W |
The 65W Ryzen 7000 fashions are sorely wanted; AMD’s AM5 ecosystem has been suffering from excessive motherboard pricing — significantly for the traditionally value-oriented B-series — and the strict requirement for DDR5 reminiscence has been a nagging situation attributable to continued excessive pricing.
In distinction, you need to use both DDR4 or DDR5 with Intel’s Raptor Lake chips, with DDR4 offering inexpensive reminiscence and motherboard choices for worth seekers, plus Intel’s downstream motherboards are typically extra reasonably priced usually.
The 65W Ryzen 7000 chips assist scale back the pricing ache for the AM5 platform, however the processor’s value is only one issue when you choose parts to your construct. Let’s have a look at how the brand new Ryzen chips fare.
Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900 Specs and Pricing
| Header Cell – Column 0 | Road/MSRP | Cores / Threads (P+E) | P-Core Base / Increase Clock (GHz) | E-Core Base / Increase Clock (GHz) | Cache (L2/L3) | TDP / PBP / MTP | Reminiscence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core i9-13900 / F | $549 – $529 (F) | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 2.0 / 5.6 | 1.5 / 4.2 | 68MB (32+36) | 65W / 219W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | $474 ($549) | 12 / 24 | 4.7 / 5.6 | – | 76MB (12+64) | 170W / 230W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 9 7900 | $429 | 12 / 24 | 3.7 / 5.3 | 76MB (12+64) | 65W / 88W | DDR5-5200 | |
| Core i7-13700K / KF | $409 (Ok) – $384 (KF) | 16 / 24 (8+8) | 3.4 / 5.4 | 2.5 / 4.2 | 54MB (24+30) | 125W / 253W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
| Core i7-13700 / F | $384 – $359 (F) | 16 / 24 (8+8) | 2.1 / 5.2 | 1.5 / 4.1 | 54MB (24+30) | 65W / 219W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | $349 ($399) | 8 /16 | 4.5 / 5.4 | – | 40MB (8+32) | 105W / 142W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | $329 | 8 / 16 | 3.8 / 5.3 GHz | 40MB (8+32) | 65W / 88W | DDR5-5200 | |
| Ryzen 5 7600X | $249 ($299) | 6 / 12 | 4.7 / 5.3 | – | 38MB (6+32) | 105W / 142W | DDR5-5200 |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | $229 | 6 / 12 | 3.8 / 5.1 GHz | 38MB (6+32) | 65W / 88W | DDR5-5200 | |
| Core i5-13600K / KF | $319 (Ok) – $294 (KF) | 14 / 20 (6+8) | 3.5 / 5.1 | 2.6 / 3.9 | 44MB (20+24) | 125W / 181W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
| Core i5-13400 / F | $221 – $196 (F) | 10 / 16 (6+4) | 2.5 / 4.6 | 1.8 / 3.3 | 29.5MB (9.5+20) | 65W /148W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 |
AMD outlined a number of new TDP ranges with the Zen 4 household, and the primary three Non-X fashions all include a 65W base TDP and 88W energy restrict (PPT) underneath load. As such, these chips have a lot decrease base clock speeds than their X-series counterparts, enabling them to suit into the decrease TDP envelope.
AMD does not have a Non-X 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X mannequin, so the 12-core 24-thread $429 Ryzen 9 7900 is probably the most highly effective 65W chip. The Ryzen 9 7900 has a 3.7 GHz base clock, a full 1 GHz decrease than the $474 Ryzen 9 7900X comparable, however it boosts to five.3 GHz. That’s solely 300 MHz decrease than the 7900X, which is affordable contemplating the 7900’s 65W/88W energy ranking in comparison with the 7900X’s 170W/230W spec.
The remainder of the 7900’s key specs are an identical to the 7900X, however AMD additionally throws within the succesful RGB Wraith Prism cooler. AMD positions the 7900 to compete with Intel’s Core i9-13900, however at a considerably lower cost level.
The Ryzen 7 7700 has eight cores and twelve threads for $329, which is a curiously small financial savings in comparison with the Ryzen 7 7700X’s $349 avenue value. A lot of this disparity stems from the truth that AMD’s advisable pricing not often resembles what you see at retailers, making value projections practically not possible earlier than the chips hit the cabinets. The Ryzen 7 7700 comes with a bundled cooler whereas the 7700X doesn’t, however we nonetheless anticipate the 7700 to quickly retail for a lot lower than the prompt pricing. The 7700 has a 3.8 GHz base (-700 MHz lower than the 7700X) and boosts as much as 5.1 GHz (-200 MHz). The 7700 additionally comes with the RGB-equipped Wraith Prism cooler, and AMD positions it to compete with the Core i7-13700.
The 6-core 12-thread Ryzen 7 7600 lowers the bar for entry to the AM5 platform to only $229, a mere $20 financial savings over the Ryzen 7 7600X. Once more, we anticipate this value to fall quite quickly at retail. The 7600 has a 2.5 GHz base clock (1 GHz lower than the 7600X) and a 5.1 GHz enhance (-200 MHz). This chip comes with a bundled Wraith Stealth cooler and can grapple with Intel’s Core i5-13600.
Like the opposite Ryzen 7000 ‘Raphael’ processors, the 65W fashions come armed with the brand new Zen 4 structure, which will increase IPC by ~13%, etched on the TSMC 5nm course of for the core compute die (CCD). As well as, AMD makes use of the TSMC 6nm course of for the I/O Die (IOD). You possibly can be taught extra about this design in our Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 article.
The Ryzen 7000 chips additionally include different applied sciences new to the Ryzen household, like a Radeon RDNA 2 iGPU for primary show output and help for AVX-512 and AI directions. The processors drop into a brand new AM5 socket that helps the PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 interfaces, largely matching Intel’s Raptor Lake on the connectivity entrance. The Socket AM5 motherboards additionally expose as much as 24 lanes of PCIe 5.0 to the consumer, which is an extra eight lanes over Intel’s Raptor Lake platform.
The Non-X fashions are totally unlocked for core, reminiscence, and material overclocking. AMD has additionally developed its personal one-click EXPO DDR5 reminiscence profiles for overclocking, rivaling Intel’s XMP normal.
Intel simply launched its personal lower-cost 65W Raptor Lake fashions throughout CES 2023. Sadly, the brand new Raptor Lake chips aren’t accessible for comparability but, so we’re subbing within the Ok-series fashions. We’ll add Intel’s 65W chips as soon as they arrive. We’re leaping proper to the benchmarks, however yow will discover the take a look at setup particulars additional under.
Gaming Efficiency on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900 — The TLDR
Beneath we now have the geometric imply of our gaming assessments at 1080p and 1440p, with every decision cut up into its personal chart. Bear in mind {that a} completely different mixture of recreation titles might yield considerably completely different outcomes (significantly with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D), however this serves as a stable general indicator of gaming efficiency. We’re testing with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 to cut back GPU-imposed bottlenecks as a lot as attainable, and variations between take a look at topics will shrink with lesser playing cards or increased resolutions and constancy. You will discover additional game-by-game breakdowns under.
Picture 1 of 6
We’ve two sequence of charts above, with the primary having a lowered variety of fashions and overclocked configurations for ease of studying. We additionally embody the total eye charts with all of the examined configurations.
As anticipated, the brand new Ryzen 7000 processors simply outperform their most directly-comparable predecessors — even the lowest-end Ryzen 5 7600 beats the quickest previous-gen Ryzen, the 5900X, by 11%.
The 65W Ryzen 9 7900 and Ryzen 7 7700X do not overtake any of the price-comparable Intel processors (the Ryzen 5 7600X will not have a contemporary Intel price-equivalent till the Core i5-13400 arrives on our take a look at bench). Nevertheless, despite the fact that the Ryzen chips do not break any new efficiency floor, they assist enhance Ryzen 7000’s price-to-performance positioning — significantly after overclocking.
As an example, the $474 Ryzen 9 7900X is 3% sooner than the $429 Ryzen 9 7900, a slight distinction given the $50 value delta and the truth that the 7900 has a ‘free’ bundled cooler. The 7900 is 5% sooner than the costlier ‘X’ mannequin after overclocking — and that is a easy job, as partaking the EXPO reminiscence profile and enabling Precision Increase Overdrive (PBO) are each one-click operations. Naturally, the 7900X maintains a small lead in its tuned configuration, however the ~1.5% distinction is within the noise of the benchmarks.
Likewise, the $349 Ryzen 7 7700X is an imperceptible 1% sooner than the $329 Ryzen 7 7700 at inventory settings and a pair of% sooner after we overclock each chips — it is simple to see why AMD was reluctant to decrease the 7700’s MSRP a lot. Conversely, you might argue the 7700X remains to be overpriced despite the fact that it retails for $70 lower than the launch pricing. In both case, the market will dictate the pricing for the 7700, and we suspect it would drop quickly.
We have turn into accustomed to the repeating theme of the 65W Ryzen 5 chip being the worth chip for avid gamers in practically each technology of Ryzen processors. The $229 Ryzen 5 7600 retains that custom intact because it trails the $249 Ryzen 5 7600X by 5% at inventory settings and three% after we overclock each chips. However, once more, the $20 value distinction between these two chips is slight, even after factoring within the 7600’s bundled cooler.
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is the quickest AMD gaming chip by far attributable to its 3D V-Cache, however its additional 96MB of L3 cache does not speed up all video games, so efficiency may be spotty. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D comes with different caveats, too. As an example, the usual chips provide a balanced efficiency profile all through the total recreation suite. In distinction, the 5800X3D income closely from just a few huge leads that quantity to outliers (like Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 and Purple Lifeless Redemption 2).
You will even have to simply accept a lot decrease efficiency in nearly each different kind of productiveness software in the event you go for the Zen 3-powered Ryzen 7 5800X3D. In case you’re searching for an unique 3D V-Cache gaming chip, the best choice is to attend till subsequent month when AMD launches the brand new Zen 4-powered Ryzen 7000X3D fashions. These chips appear like they will have a way more balanced efficiency profile.
The deltas in these charts may be slim, although, and huge deltas in particular person recreation titles, like with the 5800X3D, affect cumulative measurements. The competitors between AMD and Intel chips can fluctuate primarily based on the title and the GPU you utilize. It is best to make an knowledgeable resolution primarily based on the sorts of titles you often play, so make sure you take a look at the person assessments under.
| Tom’s {Hardware} | 1080p Sport Benchmarks |
| $589 — Core i9-13900K | 100% |
| $409 — Core i7-13700K / OC | 96% / 101.5% |
| $365 — Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 94% |
| $319 — Core i5-13600K / OC | 90% / 97% |
| $474 — Ryzen 9 7900X | 87% |
| $429 — Ryzen 9 7900 / OC | 85% / 91% |
| $349 — Ryzen 7 7700X | 87% |
| $329 — Ryzen 7 7700 / OC | 86% / 92% |
| $249 — Ryzen 5 7600X | 83.50% |
| $229 — Ryzen 5 7600 / OC | 80% / 87% |
Cyberpunk 2077 on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
We solely embody the overclocked Intel and non-X Ryzen processors in these slides, as including the total roster of chips makes for a hard-to-read chart. Make sure you test our CPU Benchmark hierarchy for extra detailed statistics.
Cyberpunk 2077 finds the Intel processors taking the lead over the Ryzen 7000 fashions by substantial margins. The 7900, 7700 and 7600 all provide related efficiency at inventory settings, trailing the 13600K by ~13%, however overclocking (PBO) exposes a bit extra differentiation between the processors. For instance, the Ryzen 9 7900’s PBO configuration shrinks the hole to five% with the 13600K. Nevertheless, the Raptor Lake chips nonetheless preserve a wholesome lead.
Far Cry 6 on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 2
Overclocking the 7900, 7700, and 7600 offers them the lead over their X-series counterparts in Far Cry 6, however keep in mind that we did not embody the PBO configuration for the X-series fashions because of the sheer variety of entries within the charts. Typically, you may anticipate the overclocked Non-X chips to barely path their X-series equivalents, however the distinction between the chips is slight.
F1 2021 on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 2
F1 2021 tends to scale by core depend, however the dual-CCD Ryzen chips do not profit, so future recreation optimizations might yield large good points for AMD’s core-heavy chips.
In the meantime, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D reminds us of the facility of its unbelievable 96MB of L3 cache: Regardless of its a lot decrease 4.5 GHz clock fee, it’s nonetheless 7% sooner than the $589 Core i9-13900K right here.
Hitman 3 on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
The Ryzen 7000 processors scale predictably primarily based on the core depend in Hitman 3, however the Raptor Lake lineup continues to dominate at its respective value factors.
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 2
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 clearly advantages tremendously from L3 cache — the Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a whopping 28% sooner than the Core i9-13900K flagship on this take a look at. This huge benefit is superb however does not signify the 5800X3D’s efficiency in most titles. It additionally illustrates how outliers could make the 5800X3D appear extra spectacular in cumulative measurements.
In both case, this does bode effectively for the Zen 4 Ryzen 7000X3D fashions, which ought to carry all of the goodness of the capacious L3 cache with fewer tradeoffs in normal purposes.
Purple Lifeless Redemption 2 on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 2
In contrast to our first outing, the Zen 4 chips acquire a significant quantity of efficiency on this title from overclocking. We retested with the newest BIOS and chipset drivers, so it is clear that the brand new AM5 platform is progressing quickly, a lot as we noticed with AM4.
Warhammer 3 on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 2
Flipping over to the 1440p charts exhibits us that increased resolutions are sometimes the good equalizer that ranges the taking part in discipline for chips with related lodging.
Watch Canines Legion on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 2
The Non-X Ryzen 7000 chips finish this spherical of recreation testing with one more stable exhibiting of typically matching the efficiency of their costlier equivalents after overclocking.
Desktop PC Utility Benchmarks on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900 — The TLDR:
We generate these cumulative measurements from the geometric imply of a very powerful software benchmarks in our choice of assessments under. These outcomes give a great indication of efficiency and the developments you may anticipate general. We embody each a centered take a look at pool and an expanded chart for this part, however to simplify our charts, we use the narrower choice within the particular person assessments additional under.
Picture 1 of 4
Total the identical normal developments that we noticed in our gaming benchmarks seem in our software testing — the Non-X Ryzen 7000 processors outperform the previous-gen Ryzen equivalents, practically match the costlier X-series fashions after overclocking, and do not change the general efficiency rankings relative to Intel’s Raptor Lake.
The $229 Ryzen 5 7600 does not ship fairly as a lot uplift in threaded work as the opposite Ryzen fashions. The 7600 is sort of a bit slower than the $295 Ryzen 5 7600X in our multi-threaded assessments, and as we noticed with the 7600X, it does not profit a lot from overclocking — it notched only a 2% enchancment from overclocking.
The $329 Ryzen 7 7700 offers extra uplift in threaded workloads from overclocking, practically matching the inventory $349 Ryzen 7 7700X in threaded purposes after overclocking granted an extra 5% extra efficiency.
The $429 Ryzen 9 7900 advantages probably the most from overclocking, as flipping the PBO and EXPO toggles yields a 17% speedup that ties the overclocked $474 Ryzen 9 7900X.
We additionally see a rarity in our single-threaded assessments — the Non-X chips expertise just a few proportion factors of uplift from PBO. Sometimes there are not any significant good points in single-threaded work from overclocking the X-series fashions, so the additional 2 to three% is a pleasant shock.
You will have to simply accept extreme efficiency tradeoffs in the event you go for AMD’s quickest gaming chip, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D. The 5800X3D is considerably slower than the newer chips as a result of it comes with the previous-gen Zen 3 structure, and the additional dollop of L3 cache does not impart any significant speedups in most traditional desktop PC purposes. In case you’re searching for an X3D chip, look forward to the 7000X3D chips that launch subsequent month.
| Tom’s {Hardware} | Multi-Thread | Single-Thread |
| $589 — Core i9-13900K | 99% | 100% |
| $569 — Ryzen 9 7950X | 100% | 90% |
| $409 — Core i7-13700K / OC | 79% / 83% | 93% / 96% |
| $319 — Core i5-13600K / OC | 61% / 68% | 88% / 97% |
| $474 — Ryzen 9 7900X | 79% | 89% |
| $429 — Ryzen 9 7900 / OC | 70% / 81% | 86% / 87% |
| $349 — Ryzen 7 7700X | 56% | 87% |
| $329 — Ryzen 7 7700 / OC | 53% / 55% | 84% / 86% |
| $249 — Ryzen 5 7600X | 44% | 86% |
| $229 — Ryzen 5 7600 / OC | 41% / 41% | 80% / 83% |
| $365 — Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 42% | 67% |
Rendering Benchmarks on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 13
Intel’s Raptor Lake rivals or beats AMD’s best in multi-threaded productiveness purposes at each value level. These outcomes, like most of the outcomes all through our different software assessments under, mirror the established developments of the Z-series fashions. As such, we’ll have restricted commentary for the appliance benchmarks.
Encoding Benchmarks on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 9
Most encoders are typically both closely threaded or nearly completely single-threaded — it takes an agile chip to grasp each disciplines. As an fascinating apart, the velocity of those fashionable chips has damaged our AV1 1080p benchmark; the Core i9 and Ryzen 9 fashions are quick sufficient that they plateau on the high velocity within the chart (particularly the overclocked configurations). We’ll replace with an acceptable alternative sooner or later.
Internet Looking, Workplace and Productiveness on Intel Core i7-13700K
Picture 1 of 8
The ever present net browser is likely one of the most often used purposes. These latency-sensitive assessments are typically frivolously threaded, so a quick response time is crucial.
Compilation, Compression, AVX-512 Efficiency on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 17
This choice of assessments runs the gamut from the exceedingly branchy code within the LLVM compilation workload to the massively parallel molecular dynamics simulation code in NAMD to encryption and compression/decompression efficiency.
Y-cruncher computes Pi with the AVX instruction set, making for an exceedingly demanding benchmark. We employed the newest model of y-cruncher that has added help for Zen 4, and right here the advantages of AVX-512 turn into obvious within the single-threaded benchmark because the Ryzen 7000 chips lead. Spreading the workload out among the many cores within the threaded portion of the y-cruncher take a look at ends in decrease efficiency for the Ryzen chips, probably attributable to reminiscence bandwidth and material limitations.
Energy Consumption on Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900
Picture 1 of 13
AMD has taken loads of flak for dialing up the facility limits for its X-series Ryzen 7000 fashions to compete with Intel’s Raptor Lake, thus making the Zen 4 chips run hotter and eat extra energy than we have seen with previous-gen Ryzen chips. Dialing again the facility limits to the 65W threshold incorporates the chip’s energy consumption, thus giving the Non-X fashions a extra favorable spot on the voltage/frequency curve. That grants them the best effectivity rankings in our take a look at pool. The 12-core Ryzen 9 7900, particularly, has excellent effectivity — practically twice that of the nearly-identical 7900X — attributable to its decrease energy envelope.
Naturally, the 65W TDP and 88W restrict of the Non-X Ryzen 7000 fashions assist rein in warmth. Though they’re designed to accommodate 95C temperatures identical to the X-series chips, we did not encounter ~95C temps with these fashions like we did with the 7950X.
In the meantime, Intel’s Raptor Lake has improved tremendously over the prior-gen Alder Lake, however they nonetheless suck extra energy, and thus generate extra warmth, than any of the Ryzen 7000 processors.
Total, AMD has superior energy consumption, effectivity, and thermal output, so you may find yourself with a cooler and quieter system of you go for Ryzen 7000.
Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 9 7900 Overclocking, Benchmark Take a look at Setup
We examined the Ryzen 7000 processors with an ASRock X670E Taichi motherboard. We used DDR5 reminiscence with all Intel configurations, however yow will discover efficiency knowledge for DDR4 configurations in our CPU Benchmark hierarchy. Notably, in the event you go for DDR4 with the Raptor Lake processors, you may lose just a few proportion factors of efficiency, on common (testing right here).
Our overclocks had been quite easy — we engaged two one-click overclocking options. First, we enabled the auto-overclocking Precision Increase Overdrive (PBO) characteristic with ‘superior motherboard’ settings and adjusted the scalar setting to 10X. We then enabled the DDR5-6000 EXPO profile for the reminiscence equipment, which additionally mechanically permits the AMD-recommended Auto setting for the material and a 1:1 ratio for the reminiscence frequency and reminiscence controller (Auto:1:1 is the advisable setting for reminiscence overclocking with Ryzen 7000).
For our inventory Intel assessments, we’re sticking with our normal coverage of permitting the motherboard to exceed the advisable energy limits, supplied the chip stays inside warrantied working circumstances. Virtually all enthusiast-class motherboards include related settings, reflecting the out-of-box expertise. So naturally, these lifted energy limits equate to extra energy consumption and, thus, extra warmth.
Microsoft just lately suggested avid gamers to disable a number of safety features to spice up gaming efficiency. As such, we disabled safe boot, virtualization help, and fTPM/PTT for max efficiency. You will discover additional {hardware} particulars within the desk on the finish of the article.
Taking the Shine off Core i9
AMD’s three new 65W ‘Non-X’ processors accomplish the objective of providing wonderful effectivity inside a decrease energy envelope. Consistent with custom, these fashions additionally decrease the pricing bar for entry to AMD’s newest platform, whereas providing practically the identical efficiency because the costlier X-series after partaking two single-click auto-overclocking mechanisms (PBO and EXPO).
Beneath, we now have the geometric imply of our gaming take a look at suite at 1080p and 1440p and a cumulative measure of efficiency in single- and multi-threaded purposes. We carried out our gaming assessments with an Nvidia RTX 4090, so efficiency deltas will shrink with lesser playing cards and better decision and constancy settings.
Picture 1 of 6
The brand new Ryzen 7000 chips commerce peak efficiency for distinctive effectivity of their inventory configuration, however partaking the auto-overclocking options purchased the Non-X fashions as much as near-parity with the pricier X-series fashions in gaming, single- and multi-threaded benchmarks. That makes the chips nice all-rounders — you need to use the inventory 65W energy settings in the event you’re constructing a low-power system like an HTPC or space-constrained SFF construct, or dial up the facility limits to make use of the chips in high-performance gaming and productiveness rigs.
The brand new Non-X chips aren’t an entire slam dunk, although. Whereas these chips enhance the price-to-performance ratio of the Ryzen 7000 sequence, they do not make any significant adjustments to the efficiency hierarchy relative to Intel’s chips: Raptor Lake nonetheless leads in nearly all efficiency metrics.
The brand new Ryzen chips are a pure pairing for lower-cost motherboards, however AMD’s AM5 platform stays besieged by increased pricing than we might anticipate for the historically value-focused B-series motherboards. Additionally, for the primary time in years, you may’t go for a previous-gen AMD motherboard to avoid wasting money — AM5 remains to be on its first technology of chipsets. You will additionally must buy expensive DDR5 reminiscence for the Ryzen 7000 processors, which is not an ideal pairing with chips on this value vary. This might be a dealbreaker if DDR5 pricing does not plummet within the coming months.
In distinction, you may go for an Intel chip, a inexpensive motherboard, and reasonably priced DDR4 reminiscence, but nonetheless come out forward on efficiency. That is a tough mixture to beat. Raptor Lake can be suitable with previous-gen motherboards if they’ve the proper BIOS, and efficiency would be the similar between 600- and 700-series if the facility supply is an identical. Intel can be rumored to have yet one more sequence of ‘Raptor Lake Refresh‘ chips destined for its present platform, so that you may need ahead compatibility, too.
AMD’s AM5 platform is younger, however the firm plans to help the socket till ‘2025+,’ so you may have the chance to improve to sooner chips sooner or later (keep in mind there is not any assure AMD will likely be within the lead then). AMD additionally features a cooler with all three of the Non-X fashions, enhancing the worth proposition. The 65W Ryzen 7000 chips even have distinctive energy effectivity in comparison with Intel’s Ok-series chips, however we now have but to match them to Intel’s new 65W fashions.
We predict AMD’s prompt pricing for just a few of those chips will not survive lengthy: There’s solely a $20 distinction between the Ryzen 7 7700 and Ryzen 5 7600 and their X-series counterparts, so we anticipate the pricing of these two CPUs to rapidly fall at retail.
In case you’re searching for higher-performance fashions, AMD has three 3D V-cache Ryzen 7000X3D chips slated for launch subsequent month, they usually’re extensively anticipated to take the lead in gaming. Intel additionally has a 6 GHz particular version Raptor Lake ready within the wings.
For now, Intel retains the efficiency and platform pricing benefit, however the firm just lately elevated the pricing for its Twelfth-Gen processors by 10%. These older processors at the moment are costlier than Intel’s new Thirteenth-Gen fashions, and the corporate has stated it would elevate chip pricing this 12 months, so we will anticipate Raptor Lake to get a value improve over the approaching months. That makes it arduous to provide agency buying recommendation, significantly since we’ve not but examined the competing 65W Intel processors. We’ll replace this overview as quickly as we now have the chips in hand.
The 65W Ryzen 7000 chips go an extended technique to decreasing the boundaries to entry for the AM5 platform, and if the pricing is correct, they may make a compelling various to Intel’s sooner chips. Nevertheless, pricing is at present unstable, so make sure that to test for up to date pricing earlier than pulling the set off.
| Intel Socket 1700 DDR5 (Z790) | Core i9-13900K, i7-13700K, i5-13600K |
| Row 1 – Cell 0 | MSI MPG Z790 Carbon WiFi |
| Row 2 – Cell 0 | G.Ability Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6800 – Inventory: DDR5-5600 | OC: XMP DDR5-6800 |
| AMD Socket AM5 (X670E) | Ryzen 9 7900, Ryzen 7 7600, Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 9 7950X, Ryzen 9 7900X, Ryzen 5 7600X |
| Row 4 – Cell 0 | ASRock X670E Taichi |
| Row 5 – Cell 0 | G.Ability Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 – Inventory: DDR5-5200 | OC/PBO: DDR5-6000 |
| Intel Socket 1700 DDR5 (Z690) | Core i5-12400 |
| Row 7 – Cell 0 | MSI MEG Z690 Ace |
| Row 8 – Cell 0 | G.Ability Trident Z5 DDR5-6400 – Inventory: DDR5-4400 | OC DDR5-6000 |
| AMD Socket AM4 (X570) | Ryzen 9 5950X, 5900X, 5700X, 5600X, 5800X3D |
| MSI MEG X570 Godlike | |
| Row 11 – Cell 0 | 2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 – Inventory: DDR4-3200 | OC/PBO: DDR4-3800 |
| All Programs | Asus RTX 4090 ROG Strix OC |
| Row 13 – Cell 0 | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle – ProViz purposes |
| Row 14 – Cell 0 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE – Utility assessments |
| 2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus, Silverstone ST1100-TI, Open Benchtable, Arctic MX-4 TIM, Home windows 11 Professional | |
| Cooling | Corsair H115i, Customized loop |
| Overclocking word | All configurations with overclocked reminiscence even have tuned core frequencies and/or lifted energy limits. |