ASRock Lists Radeon RX 6950 XT and Other Models at EEC

AMD Boasts About RDNA 3 Effectivity as RTX 40-Collection Looms

Posted on

AMD’s newest weblog discusses the efficiency per watt good points (opens in new tab) throughout the previous a number of Radeon GPU generations. AMD’s Sam Naffziger, who spoke with us about RDNA 3’s chiplet design and effectivity good points in June, says AMD made some ‘huge bets’ on GPU design and effectivity, and they’re now paying off in very significant methods. He asserts that present and future AMD GPUs are assembly the wants of demanding video games however doing so with out sky-high energy budgets. It is a well timed reminder, in case you want it, that power costs are rocketing and Nvidia is anticipated to launch some very hefty graphics playing cards tomorrow at its GeForce Past occasion.

With PC players demanding higher, quicker visuals at ever increased resolutions, it is no shock that GPUs have began to push up and past 400W, writes Sam Naffzinger, an SVP, Company Fellow, and Product Expertise Architect at AMD. Naffzinger says AMD has tuned its new RDNA architectures to interrupt away from the ever rising energy consumption cycle utilizing “considerate and revolutionary engineering and refinement.” Elevated power effectivity means lower-power graphics playing cards ought to run cooler, quieter, and be extra available in smaller or cellular kind elements.

AMD supplied some proof of its RDNA GPU structure progress, a sequence which is able to start its third era later this 12 months. For instance, the transition from GCN to RDNA “delivered a median 50 p.c performance-per-watt enchancment,” in line with Naffzinger’s stats. Shifting from the Radeon RX 5000 (RDNA) to Radeon RX 6000 (RDNA 2) era, AMD claims that it supplied “a whopping 65 p.c higher efficiency per watt.”

To boost the comparisons, AMD supplied an attention-grabbing chart illustrating its RDNA 2 vs Ampere “aggressive benefit.” Clearly, these figures are cherry picked to make AMD look good, and notice the “as much as” language. Examine our GPU benchmarks hierarchy and our checklist of the finest graphics playing cards for an impartial take a look at how issues stack up..

(Picture credit score: AMD)

This slide is arguably deceptive at finest. Should you ignore the desk and simply take a look at the headline, it seems like AMD delivers a large enhance in worth — as much as 90% extra FPS per greenback! Besides, that comparability makes use of the current Radeon RX 6400 and pits it towards the six-years-old GTX 1050 Ti, which additionally occurs to value greater than the newer GTX 1650. Hmmm. Not less than the GPU costs AMD lists look fairly correct (apart from the inclusion of the GTX 1050 Ti), and in case you omit ray tracing video games the efficiency is not too far off our personal outcomes both.

For instance, the RX 6950 XT averaged 115.4 fps at 1440p extremely in our checks, whereas the RTX 3090 averaged 106.5 fps. That matches the 8% efficiency distinction AMD exhibits within the slide — although we examined a reference RTX 3090 Founders Version towards an overclocked Sapphire RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure. One other level of rivalry could be exhibiting RX 6600 versus RTX 3050, regardless that as we identified not too long ago the RTX 2060 is Nvidia’s finest worth choice — it is quicker and cheaper than the RTX 3050. However let’s transfer on.

AMD’s weblog explains that RDNA 2’s progress over RDNA was largely on account of optimized switching, a high-frequency design, and smarter energy administration. Then it talks about the way it will proceed to push ahead with RDNA 3. Key expertise refinements and introductions in RDNA 3 embody the 5nm course of, chiplet packaging tech, adaptive energy administration, and a subsequent era Infinity Cache.

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *