Our GPU benchmarks hierarchy ranks all the present and former era graphics playing cards by efficiency, together with all the finest graphics playing cards. Whether or not it is taking part in video games or doing high-end artistic work like 4K video modifying, your graphics card sometimes performs the largest position in figuring out efficiency, and even the finest CPUs for Gaming take a secondary position.
We have revamped our GPU testbed and up to date all of our benchmarks for 2022, and are actually completed retesting almost each graphics card from the previous a number of generations. Our full hierarchy utilizing conventional rendering comes first, and under that we now have our ray tracing GPU benchmarks hierarchy. These in fact require a ray tracing succesful GPU so solely AMD’s RX 6000-series and Nvidia’s RTX playing cards are current.
Under our principal tables, you may discover our 2020–2021 benchmark suite, which has all the earlier era GPUs operating our older check suite operating on a Core i9-9900K testbed. We even have the legacy GPU hierarchy (with out benchmarks) on the backside of the article.
The next tables type every thing solely by our performance-based GPU gaming benchmarks, at 1080p “extremely” for the principle suite and at 1080p “medium” for the DXR suite. Components together with worth, graphics card energy consumption, general effectivity, and options aren’t factored into the rankings right here. We have now added the newest AMD RX 6950 XT, RX 6750 XT, and RX 6650 XT to the charts, together with the RTX 3090 Ti. All of these use customized third-party AIC fashions with manufacturing facility overclocks, so they are not fairly on the identical taking part in subject as the remainder of the reference playing cards.
We’re nonetheless ready for the Intel Arc Alchemist desktop launch, however in any other case we’re now wanting ahead to the latter a part of the 12 months when the Nvidia Ada and AMD RDNA 3 architectures ought to arrive. Truly, the newest rumors counsel Ada may land as early as July, so we would not have that lengthy to attend.
We have switched to a brand new Alder Lake Core i9-12900K testbed, modified up our check suite, and retested all the previous a number of generations of GPUs. Now let’s hit the benchmarks and tables.
Graphics Card Offers
The part shortages and skyrocketing demand which have been killing graphics card availability and GPU costs appear to be coming to an finish. You could find most of the newest GPUs at costs approaching or generally even beating MSRP.
One different to purchasing a brand new graphics card is to buy a prebuilt desktop that has your GPU of alternative inside. You’ll be able to both pull the cardboard and resell the PC or, select a gaming desktop you actually like and make it a whole improve. Listed here are some fast hyperlinks that will help you discover a graphics card deal on a system in the event you go this route, together with a direct hyperlink so you possibly can see what the newest costs are on the open market.
GPU Benchmarks Rating 2022
For our newest benchmarks, we check all GPUs at 1080p medium and 1080p extremely, and kind the desk by the 1080p extremely outcomes. The place it is smart, we additionally check at 1440p extremely and 4K extremely. All the scores are scaled relative to the top-ranking 1080p extremely card, which in our new suite is the Radeon RX 6950 XT (a minimum of at 1080p and 1440p).
You too can see the above abstract chart exhibiting the relative efficiency of the playing cards we have examined throughout the previous a number of generations of {hardware} at 1080p extremely. There are a couple of lacking choices (e.g., the GTX 1650 GDDR6, GT 1030, and several other Titan playing cards), however in any other case it is almost full now.
The eight video games we’re utilizing for our normal GPU benchmarks hierarchy are Borderlands 3 (DX12), Far Cry 6 (DX12), Flight Simulator (DX12), Forza Horizon 5 (DX12), Horizon Zero Daybreak (DX12), Purple Lifeless Redemption 2 (Vulkan), Complete Struggle Warhammer 3 (DX11), and Watch Canines Legion (DX12). The fps rating is the geometric imply (equal weighting) of the eight video games.
Graphics Card | 1080p Extremely | 1080p Medium | 1440p Extremely | 4K Extremely | Specs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radeon RX 6950 XT | 100.0% (137.3fps) | 100.0% (190.1fps) | 100.0% (115.4fps) | 100.0% (70.3fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2310MHz, 16GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 576GB/s, 335W |
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 96.5% (132.4fps) | 94.8% (180.1fps) | 98.7% (113.9fps) | 107.6% (75.7fps) | GA102, 10752 shaders, 1860MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W |
Radeon RX 6900 XT | 94.5% (129.7fps) | 97.1% (184.6fps) | 91.4% (105.5fps) | 89.7% (63.1fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
GeForce RTX 3090 | 92.2% (126.6fps) | 93.7% (178.1fps) | 92.3% (106.5fps) | 97.8% (68.8fps) | GA102, 10496 shaders, 1695MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@19.5Gbps, 936GB/s, 350W |
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | 90.7% (124.5fps) | 93.8% (178.2fps) | 90.1% (104.0fps) | 94.3% (66.3fps) | GA102, 8960 shaders, 1845MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 400W |
Radeon RX 6800 XT | 90.0% (123.5fps) | 94.2% (179.1fps) | 86.5% (99.8fps) | 83.2% (58.5fps) | Navi 21, 4608 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 89.9% (123.4fps) | 92.0% (174.9fps) | 89.6% (103.4fps) | 94.5% (66.5fps) | GA102, 10240 shaders, 1665MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 350W |
GeForce RTX 3080 | 84.7% (116.3fps) | 91.2% (173.4fps) | 82.8% (95.5fps) | 86.2% (60.6fps) | GA102, 8704 shaders, 1710MHz, 10GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 760GB/s, 320W |
Radeon RX 6800 | 80.7% (110.7fps) | 90.9% (172.7fps) | 75.9% (87.5fps) | 71.9% (50.6fps) | Navi 21, 3840 shaders, 2105MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 250W |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 75.8% (104.1fps) | 85.4% (162.4fps) | 71.5% (82.6fps) | 66.6% (46.8fps) | GA104, 6144 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 608GB/s, 290W |
Radeon RX 6750 XT | 73.7% (101.2fps) | 88.4% (168.0fps) | 65.3% (75.4fps) | 59.6% (41.9fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2600MHz, 12GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 432GB/s, 250W |
Titan RTX | 73.6% (101.0fps) | 83.2% (158.2fps) | 69.7% (80.5fps) | 68.7% (48.3fps) | TU102, 4608 shaders, 1770MHz, 24GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 672GB/s, 280W |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 72.7% (99.8fps) | 82.9% (157.7fps) | 67.2% (77.5fps) | 61.4% (43.2fps) | GA104, 5888 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 220W |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 69.9% (96.0fps) | 79.8% (151.6fps) | 65.3% (75.3fps) | 63.4% (44.6fps) | TU102, 4352 shaders, 1545MHz, 11GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 616GB/s, 250W |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | 69.8% (95.8fps) | 84.1% (159.8fps) | 61.3% (70.8fps) | 56.1% (39.4fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2581MHz, 12GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 384GB/s, 230W |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 66.7% (91.5fps) | 78.8% (149.7fps) | 60.4% (69.7fps) | GA104, 4864 shaders, 1665MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 200W | |
GeForce RTX 2080 Tremendous | 61.9% (84.9fps) | 72.5% (137.8fps) | 56.3% (64.9fps) | 49.1% (34.5fps) | TU104, 3072 shaders, 1815MHz, 8GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 496GB/s, 250W |
GeForce RTX 2080 | 59.9% (82.2fps) | 70.1% (133.1fps) | 54.1% (62.4fps) | TU104, 2944 shaders, 1710MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
Radeon RX 6650 XT | 58.2% (79.9fps) | 72.8% (138.4fps) | 49.2% (56.7fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2635MHz, 8GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 280GB/s, 180W | |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | 56.9% (78.1fps) | 71.8% (136.5fps) | 47.6% (54.9fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2589MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 256GB/s, 160W | |
GeForce RTX 2070 Tremendous | 55.7% (76.4fps) | 65.3% (124.1fps) | 49.8% (57.4fps) | TU104, 2560 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | 53.7% (73.7fps) | 66.2% (125.8fps) | 46.2% (53.3fps) | 41.6% (29.3fps) | Navi 10, 2560 shaders, 1905MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 225W |
GeForce RTX 3060 | 51.1% (70.2fps) | 62.5% (118.8fps) | 45.6% (52.6fps) | GA106, 3584 shaders, 1777MHz, 12GB GDDR6@15Gbps, 360GB/s, 170W | |
Radeon VII | 50.8% (69.7fps) | 60.0% (114.0fps) | 45.9% (53.0fps) | 44.7% (31.4fps) | Vega 20, 3840 shaders, 1750MHz, 16GB HBM2@2.0Gbps, 1024GB/s, 300W |
GeForce RTX 2070 | 49.5% (67.9fps) | 58.2% (110.7fps) | 44.2% (51.0fps) | TU106, 2304 shaders, 1620MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
Radeon RX 6600 | 48.6% (66.7fps) | 62.0% (117.8fps) | 40.0% (46.1fps) | Navi 23, 1792 shaders, 2491MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 132W | |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 48.5% (66.5fps) | 58.2% (110.6fps) | 43.6% (50.3fps) | 42.0% (29.5fps) | GP102, 3584 shaders, 1582MHz, 11GB GDDR5X@11Gbps, 484GB/s, 250W |
GeForce RTX 2060 Tremendous | 47.4% (65.1fps) | 55.7% (105.9fps) | 41.8% (48.2fps) | TU106, 2176 shaders, 1650MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
Radeon RX 5700 | 47.2% (64.8fps) | 58.5% (111.3fps) | 40.9% (47.2fps) | Navi 10, 2304 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 180W | |
Radeon RX 5600 XT | 42.3% (58.1fps) | 52.9% (100.6fps) | 36.4% (42.0fps) | Navi 10, 2304 shaders, 1750MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W | |
Radeon RX Vega 64 | 41.4% (56.8fps) | 49.6% (94.3fps) | 36.1% (41.6fps) | 33.4% (23.5fps) | Vega 10, 4096 shaders, 1546MHz, 8GB HBM2@1.89Gbps, 484GB/s, 295W |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 40.2% (55.2fps) | 50.9% (96.8fps) | 33.6% (38.7fps) | TU106, 1920 shaders, 1680MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W | |
GeForce GTX 1080 | 38.7% (53.1fps) | 47.3% (90.0fps) | 34.2% (39.4fps) | GP104, 2560 shaders, 1733MHz, 8GB GDDR5X@10Gbps, 320GB/s, 180W | |
GeForce RTX 3050 | 37.5% (51.4fps) | 47.0% (89.4fps) | 32.6% (37.6fps) | GA106, 2560 shaders, 1777MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W | |
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 37.2% (51.1fps) | 45.1% (85.8fps) | 32.9% (37.9fps) | GP104, 2432 shaders, 1683MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 180W | |
Radeon RX Vega 56 | 36.9% (50.6fps) | 44.4% (84.4fps) | 32.0% (37.0fps) | Vega 10, 3584 shaders, 1471MHz, 8GB HBM2@1.6Gbps, 410GB/s, 210W | |
GeForce GTX 1070 | 32.6% (44.8fps) | 33.7% (64.0fps) | 33.6% (38.8fps) | GP104, 1920 shaders, 1683MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 150W | |
GeForce GTX 1660 Tremendous | 32.4% (44.4fps) | 43.6% (82.8fps) | 27.3% (31.5fps) | TU116, 1408 shaders, 1785MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 125W | |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 32.0% (43.9fps) | 43.1% (81.9fps) | 27.4% (31.6fps) | TU116, 1536 shaders, 1770MHz, 6GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 288GB/s, 120W | |
GeForce GTX 1660 | 29.1% (39.9fps) | 39.5% (75.1fps) | 24.7% (28.5fps) | TU116, 1408 shaders, 1785MHz, 6GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W | |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | 29.0% (39.8fps) | 38.2% (72.6fps) | 24.7% (28.5fps) | Navi 14, 1408 shaders, 1845MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W | |
Radeon RX 590 | 28.7% (39.4fps) | 36.1% (68.6fps) | 25.2% (29.1fps) | Polaris 30, 2304 shaders, 1545MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 225W | |
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 26.1% (35.9fps) | 32.9% (62.6fps) | 23.1% (26.7fps) | GM200, 2816 shaders, 1075MHz, 6GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 336GB/s, 250W | |
Radeon R9 Fury X | 25.8% (35.4fps) | 33.9% (64.4fps) | Fiji, 4096 shaders, 1050MHz, 4GB HBM2@2Gbps, 512GB/s, 275W | ||
Radeon RX 580 8GB | 25.8% (35.3fps) | 32.5% (61.7fps) | 22.5% (26.0fps) | Polaris 20, 2304 shaders, 1340MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 185W | |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | 24.4% (33.5fps) | 35.2% (66.9fps) | Navi 14, 1408 shaders, 1845MHz, 4GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 Tremendous | 24.2% (33.2fps) | 35.7% (67.9fps) | 19.9% (23.0fps) | TU116, 1280 shaders, 1725MHz, 4GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 192GB/s, 100W | |
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 23.5% (32.2fps) | 30.5% (58.0fps) | 20.0% (23.0fps) | GP106, 1280 shaders, 1708MHz, 6GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W | |
Radeon RX 6500 XT | 22.2% (30.4fps) | 34.4% (65.4fps) | 15.6% (18.0fps) | Navi 24, 1024 shaders, 2815MHz, 4GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 144GB/s, 107W | |
Radeon R9 390 | 21.7% (29.8fps) | 26.9% (51.2fps) | Grenada, 2560 shaders, 1000MHz, 8GB GDDR5@6Gbps, 384GB/s, 275W | ||
GeForce GTX 980 | 21.1% (28.9fps) | 28.2% (53.7fps) | GM204, 2048 shaders, 1216MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 256GB/s, 165W | ||
Radeon RX 570 4GB | 20.6% (28.3fps) | 28.2% (53.6fps) | 17.3% (20.0fps) | Polaris 20, 2048 shaders, 1244MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 224GB/s, 150W | |
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 20.2% (27.8fps) | 27.7% (52.6fps) | GP106, 1152 shaders, 1708MHz, 3GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 | 19.4% (26.6fps) | 26.9% (51.1fps) | TU117, 896 shaders, 1665MHz, 4GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 128GB/s, 75W | ||
GeForce GTX 970 | 19.3% (26.5fps) | 25.9% (49.1fps) | GM204, 1664 shaders, 1178MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 256GB/s, 145W | ||
GeForce GTX 780 | 16.0% (22.0fps) | 20.3% (38.5fps) | GK110, 2304 shaders, 900MHz, 3GB GDDR5@6Gbps, 288GB/s, 230W | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 14.4% (19.8fps) | 20.0% (38.0fps) | GP107, 768 shaders, 1392MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 75W | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 | 10.8% (14.8fps) | 15.7% (29.8fps) | GP107, 640 shaders, 1455MHz, 2GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 75W | ||
Radeon RX 560 4GB | 10.8% (14.8fps) | 16.8% (31.8fps) | Baffin, 1024 shaders, 1275MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 60-80W | ||
Radeon RX 550 4GB | 0.7% (1.0fps) | 10.3% (19.6fps) | Lexa, 640 shaders, 1183MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 50W |
*: GPU could not run all checks, so the general rating is barely skewed at 1080p extremely.
Our up to date check suite and testbed favor AMD’s GPUs barely, notably at 1080p and even 1440p — which is maybe another reason the RTX 3090 Ti exists, because it largely retakes the throne in any respect resolutions, although the brand new 6950 XT reclaims high honors. Remember the fact that we’re not together with any ray tracing or DLSS ends in the above desk, as we intend to make use of the identical check suite with the identical settings on all present and former era graphics playing cards.
AMD’s RX 6950 XT does not massively increase efficiency, however it’s sufficient to make up the hole with the 3090 Ti, and it does so whereas costing over 40% much less. AMD additionally wins, fairly simply, within the efficiency per watt metric. Stepping down the record, the 3090 and 3080 12GB — an overclocked MSI mannequin, since there aren’t any reference 3080 12GB playing cards — place simply forward of the 6800 XT, adopted by the 3080 Ti. The RX 6800 additionally beats the RTX 3070 Ti, whereas the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT are successfully tied.
The rankings favor AMD much less on the decrease portion of the chart, with the RTX 3060 and RX 6600 additionally tied, and the RTX 3050 simply eclipses the RX 6500 XT — not that it is troublesome to take action, as each the 4GB and 8GB RX 5500 XT additionally beat AMD’s newest price range providing.
Turning to the earlier era GPUs, the RTX 20-series and GTX 16-series chips find yourself scattered all through the outcomes, together with the RX 5000-series. The overall rule of thumb is that you just get one or two “mannequin upgrades” with the newer structure, so for instance the RTX 2080 Tremendous is available in slightly below the RTX 3060 Ti, whereas the RX 5700 XT lands a couple of % behind the RX 6600 XT.
Return far sufficient, and you’ll see how trendy video games at extremely settings severely punish playing cards that do not have greater than 4GB VRAM. We have been saying for a couple of years now that 4GB is simply scraping by, and 6GB or extra is fascinating. The GTX 1060 3GB, GTX 1050, and GTX 780 really didn’t run a few of our checks, which skews their outcomes a bit, regardless that they do higher at 1080p medium.
Now let’s swap over to the ray tracing hierarchy.
Ray Tracing GPU Benchmarks Rating 2022
Enabling ray tracing, notably with demanding video games like these we’re utilizing in our DXR check suite, may cause framerates to drop off a cliff. We’re testing with “medium” and “extremely” ray tracing settings. Medium means utilizing medium graphics settings however turning on ray tracing results (set to “medium” if that is an possibility), whereas extremely activates all the RT choices at roughly most high quality.
As a result of ray tracing is a lot extra demanding, we’re sorting these outcomes by the 1080p medium scores. That is additionally as a result of the RX 6500 XT principally cannot deal with ray tracing even at these settings, and testing at something greater than 1080p medium could be fruitless. We have completed testing all the present ray tracing succesful GPUs, although there can be extra sooner or later. We’re undoubtedly curious to see if Intel’s Arc GPUs can do any higher than the RX 6500 XT, and suspect the reply is likely to be “nope” on the decrease tier A300 sequence.
The six ray tracing video games we’re utilizing are Brilliant Reminiscence Infinite, Management Final Version, Cyberpunk 2077, Fortnite, Metro Exodus Enhanced, and Minecraft — all of those use the DirectX 12 / DX12 Final API. The fps rating is the geometric imply (equal weighting) of the six video games, and the share is scaled relative to the quickest GPU within the record, which on this case is the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
Graphics Card | 1080p Medium | 1080p Extremely | 1440p Extremely | 4K Extremely | Specs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 100.0% (118.2fps) | 100.0% (84.4fps) | 100.0% (57.2fps) | 100.0% (29.1fps) | GA102, 10752 shaders, 1860MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W |
GeForce RTX 3090 | 91.7% (108.4fps) | 89.7% (75.7fps) | 88.7% (50.8fps) | 87.2% (25.4fps) | GA102, 10496 shaders, 1695MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@19.5Gbps, 936GB/s, 350W |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 89.3% (105.6fps) | 87.6% (73.9fps) | 86.0% (49.2fps) | 84.6% (24.7fps) | GA102, 10240 shaders, 1665MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 350W |
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | 88.5% (104.7fps) | 85.8% (72.4fps) | 83.7% (47.9fps) | 81.4% (23.7fps) | GA102, 8960 shaders, 1845MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 400W |
GeForce RTX 3080 | 81.5% (96.3fps) | 78.5% (66.3fps) | 76.3% (43.7fps) | 72.2% (21.0fps) | GA102, 8704 shaders, 1710MHz, 10GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 760GB/s, 320W |
Radeon RX 6950 XT | 70.4% (83.2fps) | 66.7% (56.2fps) | 62.9% (36.0fps) | 59.0% (17.2fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2310MHz, 16GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 576GB/s, 335W |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 66.3% (78.4fps) | 63.0% (53.1fps) | 59.2% (33.9fps) | GA104, 6144 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 608GB/s, 290W | |
Radeon RX 6900 XT | 63.0% (74.5fps) | 59.0% (49.8fps) | 55.2% (31.6fps) | 51.7% (15.1fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
Titan RTX | 62.5% (73.9fps) | 58.2% (49.1fps) | 55.4% (31.7fps) | 52.5% (15.3fps) | TU102, 4608 shaders, 1770MHz, 24GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 672GB/s, 280W |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 62.1% (73.4fps) | 58.7% (49.6fps) | 54.9% (31.4fps) | GA104, 5888 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 220W | |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 59.2% (70.0fps) | 55.1% (46.5fps) | 52.0% (29.7fps) | TU102, 4352 shaders, 1545MHz, 11GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 616GB/s, 250W | |
Radeon RX 6800 XT | 59.0% (69.7fps) | 54.6% (46.1fps) | 51.3% (29.4fps) | 48.2% (14.0fps) | Navi 21, 4608 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 55.2% (65.3fps) | 51.3% (43.3fps) | 47.8% (27.4fps) | GA104, 4864 shaders, 1665MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 200W | |
Radeon RX 6800 | 50.4% (59.6fps) | 46.6% (39.3fps) | 43.6% (24.9fps) | Navi 21, 3840 shaders, 2105MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 250W | |
GeForce RTX 2080 Tremendous | 49.6% (58.6fps) | 45.0% (37.9fps) | 41.6% (23.8fps) | TU104, 3072 shaders, 1815MHz, 8GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 496GB/s, 250W | |
GeForce RTX 2080 | 47.5% (56.2fps) | 42.5% (35.9fps) | 39.1% (22.4fps) | TU104, 2944 shaders, 1710MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
GeForce RTX 2070 Tremendous | 43.6% (51.5fps) | 39.2% (33.1fps) | 35.5% (20.3fps) | TU104, 2560 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
Radeon RX 6750 XT | 41.7% (49.3fps) | 39.1% (33.0fps) | 35.6% (20.4fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2600MHz, 12GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 432GB/s, 250W | |
GeForce RTX 3060 | 41.2% (48.7fps) | 38.3% (32.3fps) | 35.1% (20.1fps) | GA106, 3584 shaders, 1777MHz, 12GB GDDR6@15Gbps, 360GB/s, 170W | |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | 38.8% (45.9fps) | 36.4% (30.7fps) | 32.9% (18.8fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2581MHz, 12GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 384GB/s, 230W | |
GeForce RTX 2070 | 38.5% (45.5fps) | 34.9% (29.4fps) | 31.6% (18.1fps) | TU106, 2304 shaders, 1620MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
GeForce RTX 2060 Tremendous | 36.9% (43.6fps) | 33.0% (27.9fps) | 29.9% (17.1fps) | TU106, 2176 shaders, 1650MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 31.8% (37.6fps) | 26.7% (22.5fps) | TU106, 1920 shaders, 1680MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W | ||
Radeon RX 6650 XT | 31.6% (37.3fps) | 29.0% (24.5fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2635MHz, 8GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 280GB/s, 180W | ||
Radeon RX 6600 XT | 30.8% (36.4fps) | 28.0% (23.6fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2589MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 256GB/s, 160W | ||
GeForce RTX 3050 | 29.4% (34.8fps) | 27.0% (22.8fps) | GA106, 2560 shaders, 1777MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W | ||
Radeon RX 6600 | 25.8% (30.5fps) | 23.3% (19.6fps) | Navi 23, 1792 shaders, 2491MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 132W | ||
Radeon RX 6500 XT | 7.9% (9.4fps) | Navi 24, 1024 shaders, 2815MHz, 4GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 144GB/s, 107W |
The place AMD can declare the highest spot in our normal check suite at 1080p and 1440p, as soon as we allow ray tracing, the very best AMD can do is sixth place, simply forward of the RTX, RTX 3070 Ti. It is a precipitous drop, and we’re not even utilizing DLSS, which all six of our DXR video games assist.
You’ll be able to see what DLSS High quality mode did for efficiency on the Asus RTX 3090 Ti in our evaluate, however the brief abstract is that it boosted efficiency by 48% at 1080p extremely, 62% at 1440p extremely, and 89% at 4K extremely — with that final taking efficiency from a borderline unplayable 31 fps common as much as a snug 60 fps. You too can legitimately use the Balanced and Efficiency modes with out killing picture high quality, particularly at 4K, which is able to ship even bigger features.
AMD’s FSR 2.0 would show helpful right here, if AMD can get widespread adoption — AMD’s quickest GPUs can barely handle 1440p at greater than 30 fps. Additionally be aware that not one of the GPUs can deal with native 4K in all the video games, although the RTX 3080 was 45% sooner than the RX 6900 XT, and the RTX 3090 Ti was 93% sooner. Hopefully the upcoming Nvidia Ada and AMD RDNA 3 GPUs will be capable to deal with 4K at native decision whereas reaching playable framerates, however even then we anticipate DLSS or FSR 2.0 can be essential for 60 fps or extra.
The midrange GPUs just like the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT principally handle 1080p extremely and never way more, whereas the underside tier of DXR-capable GPUs barely handle 1080p medium — and the RX 6500 XT cannot even try this, with single digit framerates in most of our check suite, and one sport that would not even work at our chosen “medium” settings. (Management requires a minimum of 6GB VRAM to allow you to enabled ray tracing.)
It is also attention-grabbing to take a look at the generational efficiency of Nvidia’s RTX playing cards. The slowest 20-series GPU, the RTX 2060, nonetheless outperforms the brand new RTX 3050 by a bit, however the quickest RTX 2080 Ti is available in a bit behind the RTX 3070. The place the 2080 Ti principally doubled the efficiency of the 2060, the 3090 delivers about triple the efficiency of the 3050.
2020-2021 GPU Benchmarks Rating
The outcomes under are from our earlier model of the GPU benchmarks hierarchy, utilizing a unique check suite and mixing outcomes from 9 video games with six decision and setting mixtures. All the scores are mixed (by way of a geometrical imply calculation) right into a single general end result, which tends to penalize the quickest and slowest GPUs — CPU bottlenecks come into play at 1080p medium, whereas VRAM limitations can kill efficiency at 4K extremely.
These outcomes haven’t been up to date since early 2022, once we added the RTX 3050 and RX 6500 XT to the record. We can’t be including future GPUs to this desk, so there isn’t any 3090 Ti, 6950 XT, 6750 XT, or 6650 XT, however it does assist to supply a have a look at a barely much less demanding suite of video games, the place 6GB or extra VRAM is not usually required at 1080p extremely settings. You should utilize these older outcomes to assist inform your buy choices, in the event you do not sometimes run the newest video games at maxed out settings.
Selecting a Graphics Card
Which graphics card do you want? That will help you determine, we created this GPU benchmarks hierarchy consisting of dozens of GPUs from the previous 4 generations of {hardware}. Not surprisingly, the quickest playing cards use both Nvidia’s Ampere structure or AMD’s Huge Navi. AMD’s newest graphics playing cards carry out effectively with out ray tracing, however are inclined to fall behind as soon as RT will get enabled — much more so in the event you allow DLSS, which it’s best to. GPU costs are nonetheless a large hindrance to upgrading, sadly, and we’re seemingly a minimum of six months away from hitting considerably cheap ranges.
In fact it is not nearly taking part in video games. Many functions use the GPU for different work, and we lined some skilled GPU benchmarks in our RTX 3090 Ti evaluate. However an excellent graphics card for gaming will sometimes do equally effectively in complicated GPU computational workloads. Purchase one of many high playing cards and you’ll run video games at excessive resolutions and body charges with the results turned all the way in which up, and you can do content material creation work equally effectively. Drop right down to the center and decrease parts of the record and you will want to begin dialing down the settings to get acceptable efficiency in common sport play and GPU benchmarks.
It is not nearly high-end GPUs both, in fact. We examined Intel’s Xe Graphics DG1, which principally competes with built-in graphics options. The outcomes weren’t fairly, and we did not even strive operating any of these at settings past 1080p medium. Nonetheless, you possibly can see the place these GPUs land on the very backside of the 2020-2021 GPU benchmarks record. Fortunately, Intel’s Arc Alchemist, aka DG2, seems to be reduce from fully completely different fabric. We hope, anyway.
In case your principal objective is gaming, you possibly can’t neglect in regards to the CPU. Getting the absolute best gaming GPU will not assist you to a lot in case your CPU is underpowered and/or outdated. So make sure to take a look at the Greatest CPUs for gaming web page, in addition to our CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy to be sure to have the suitable CPU for the extent of gaming you are seeking to obtain.
Check System and How We Check for GPU Benchmarks
We have used two completely different PCs for our testing. The newest 2022 and later configuration makes use of an Alder Lake CPU and platform, whereas our earlier testbed makes use of Espresso Lake and Z390. Listed here are the main points of the 2 PCs.
Tom’s {Hardware} 2022 GPU Testbed
Intel Core i9-12900K
MSI Professional Z690-A WiFi DDR4
Corsair 2x16GB DDR4-3600 CL16
Essential P5 Plus 2TB
Cooler Grasp MWE 1250 V2 Gold
Cooler Grasp PL360 Flux
Cooler Grasp HAF500
Home windows 11 Professional 64-bit
Tom’s {Hardware} 2020–2021 GPU Testbed
Intel Core i9-9900K
Corsair H150i Professional RGB
MSI MEG Z390 Ace
Corsair 2x16GB DDR4-3200
XPG SX8200 Professional 2TB
Home windows 10 Professional (21H1)
For every graphics card, we observe the identical testing process. We run one go of every benchmark to “heat up” the GPU after launching the sport, then run a minimum of two passes at every setting/decision mixture. If the 2 runs are principally equivalent (inside 0.5% or much less distinction), we use the sooner of the 2 runs. If there’s greater than a small distinction, we run the check a minimum of twice extra to find out what “regular” efficiency is meant to be.
We additionally have a look at all the info and examine for anomalies, so for instance RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 3070, and RTX 3060 Ti all usually going to carry out inside a slender vary — 3070 Ti is about 5% sooner than 3070, which is about 5% sooner than 3060 Ti. If we see video games the place there are clear outliers (i.e. efficiency is greater than 10% increased for the playing cards simply talked about), we’ll return and retest no matter playing cards are exhibiting the anomaly and work out what the “appropriate” end result could be.
As a result of size of time required for testing every GPU, up to date drivers and sport patches inevitably will come out that may influence efficiency. We periodically retest a couple of pattern playing cards to confirm our outcomes are nonetheless legitimate, and if not, we undergo and retest the affected sport(s) and GPU(s). We might also add video games to our check suite over the approaching 12 months, if one comes out that’s common and conducive to testing — see our what makes an excellent sport benchmark for our choice standards.
GPU Benchmarks: Particular person Recreation Charts
The above tables present a abstract of efficiency, however for people who wish to see the person sport charts, for each the usual and ray tracing check suites, we have these as effectively. These charts have been up-to-date as of Might 19, 2022, with testing carried out utilizing the newest Nvidia and AMD drivers most often, although a few of the playing cards have been examined with barely older drivers.
Notice that we’re solely together with the previous two generations of {hardware} in these charts, as in any other case issues get too cramped — and you’ll argue that with 35 playing cards within the 1080p charts, we’re already effectively previous that time. (Trace: Click on the enlarge icon in the event you’re on PC.)
Additionally be aware that we have switched from DX12 to DX11 for Microsoft Flight Simulator testing, partly as a result of DX12 began to have points just lately, partly as a result of DX12 continues to be listed as “beta,” however largely as a result of we have decided DX11 runs sooner — somethings by greater than 10% — on most GPUs. We have retested all the playing cards in DX11 mode now.
Energy, Clocks, Temperatures, and Fan Speeds
Whereas our GPU benchmarks hierarchy kinds issues solely by efficiency, for these involved in energy and different features of the GPUs, listed below are the suitable charts.
Legacy GPU Hierarchy
Under is our legacy desktop GPU hierarchy relationship again to the late Nineteen Nineties. We now have not examined most of those playing cards in a few years, driver assist has ended on most of those fashions, and the relative rankings are fairly coarse. Notice that we additionally do not think about reminiscence bandwidth or options like AMD’s Infinity Cache. The record under is usually supposed to point out relative efficiency between architectures from an identical time interval.
We sorted the desk by the theoretical GFLOPS, although on architectures that do not assist unified shaders, we solely have knowledge for “Gops/s” (giga operations per second). That is GeForce 7 and Radeon X1000 and earlier — principally something from earlier than 2007. We have put an asterisk (*) subsequent to the GPU names for these playing cards, and so they comprise the latter a part of the desk. Evaluating pre-2007 GPUs towards one another ought to be comparatively significant, however making an attempt to match these older GPUs towards newer GPUs will get a bit convoluted.
GPU | Launch Date | Structure | Shaders | Clockspeed | GFLOPS (GOps) | Launch Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | March 2022 | GA102 | 10752 | 1860 | 39,997 | $1,999 |
GeForce RTX 3090 | September 2020 | GA102 | 10496 | 1695 | 35,581 | $1,499 |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | June 2021 | GA102 | 10240 | 1665 | 34,099 | $1,249 |
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | January 2022 | GA102 | 8960 | 1710 | 30,643 | $1,199 |
GeForce RTX 3080 | September 2020 | GA102 | 8704 | 1710 | 29,768 | $699 |
Radeon RX 6900 XT | December 2020 | Navi 21 | 5120 | 2250 | 23,040 | $999 |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | June 2021 | GA104 | 6144 | 1770 | 21,750 | $599 |
Radeon RX 6800 XT | November 2020 | Navi 21 | 4608 | 2250 | 20,736 | $649 |
GeForce RTX 3070 | October 2020 | GA104 | 5888 | 1725 | 20,314 | $499 |
Nvidia Titan RTX | December 2018 | TU102 | 4608 | 1770 | 16,312 | $2,499 |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | December 2020 | GA104 | 4864 | 1665 | 16,197 | $399 |
Radeon RX 6800 | November 2020 | Navi 21 | 3840 | 2105 | 16,166 | $579 |
Nvidia Titan V | December 2017 | GV100 | 5120 | 1455 | 14,899 | $2,999 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | September 2018 | TU102 | 4352 | 1545 | 13,448 | $1,199 |
Radeon VII | February 2019 | Vega 20 | 3840 | 1750 | 13,440 | $699 |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | March 2021 | Navi 22 | 2560 | 2581 | 13,215 | $479 |
GeForce RTX 3060 | February 2021 | GA106 | 3584 | 1777 | 12,738 | $329 |
Radeon RX Vega 64 | August 2017 | Vega 10 | 4096 | 1546 | 12,665 | $499 |
Radeon R9 295X2 | April 2014 | Vesuvius (x2) | 5632 | 1018 | 11,467 | $1,499 |
Nvidia Titan Xp | April 2017 | GP102 | 3840 | 1480 | 11,366 | $1,199 |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | March 2017 | GP102 | 3584 | 1582 | 11,340 | $699 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Tremendous | July 2019 | TU104 | 3072 | 1815 | 11,151 | $699 |
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) | August 2016 | GP102 | 3584 | 1531 | 10,974 | $1,199 |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | August 2021 | Navi 23 | 2048 | 2589 | 10,605 | $379 |
Radeon RX Vega 56 | August 2017 | Vega 10 | 3584 | 1471 | 10,544 | $399 |
GeForce GTX Titan Z | Might 2014 | 2x GK110 | 5760 | 876 | 10,092 | $2,999 |
GeForce RTX 2080 | September 2018 | TU104 | 2944 | 1710 | 10,068 | $699 |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | July 2019 | Navi 10 | 2560 | 1905 | 9,754 | $399 |
GeForce RTX 3050 | January 2022 | GA106 | 2560 | 1777 | 9,098 | $249 |
GeForce RTX 2070 Tremendous | July 2019 | TU104 | 2560 | 1770 | 9,062 | $499 |
Radeon RX 6600 | October 2021 | Navi 23 | 1792 | 2491 | 8,928 | $329 |
GeForce GTX 1080 | Might 2016 | GP104 | 2560 | 1733 | 8,873 | $599 ($499) |
Radeon R9 Fury X | June 2015 | Fiji | 4096 | 1050 | 8,602 | $649 |
Radeon R9 Nano | August 2015 | Fiji | 4096 | 1000 | 8,192 | $649 |
Radeon HD 7990 | April 2013 | New Zealand (x2) | 4096 | 1000 | 8,192 | $1,000 |
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | November 2017 | GP104 | 2432 | 1683 | 8,186 | $449 |
Radeon RX 5600 XT | January 2020 | Navi 10 | 2304 | 1750 | 8,064 | $279 |
Radeon RX 5700 | July 2019 | Navi 10 | 2304 | 1725 | 7,949 | $249 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | October 2018 | TU106 | 2304 | 1620 | 7,465 | $499 |
GeForce RTX 2060 Tremendous | July 2019 | TU106 | 2176 | 1650 | 7,181 | $399 |
Radeon R9 Fury | July 2015 | Fiji | 3584 | 1000 | 7,168 | $549 |
Radeon RX 590 | November 2018 | Polaris 30 | 2304 | 1545 | 7,119 | $279 |
GeForce GTX Titan X (Maxwell) | March 2015 | GM200 | 3072 | 1075 | 6,605 | $999 |
GeForce GTX 1070 | June 2016 | GP104 | 1920 | 1683 | 6,463 | $379 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | January 2019 | TU106 | 1920 | 1680 | 6,451 | $349 |
GeForce GTX 690 | April 2012 | 2x GK104 | 3072 | 1019 | 6,261 | $1,000 |
Radeon RX 580 8GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2304 | 1340 | 6,175 | $229 |
Radeon RX 580 4GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2304 | 1340 | 6,175 | $199 |
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | June 2015 | GM200 | 2816 | 1075 | 6,054 | $649 |
Radeon R9 390X | June 2015 | Grenada | 2816 | 1050 | 5,914 | $429 |
Radeon RX 480 8GB | June 2016 | Ellesmere | 2304 | 1266 | 5,834 | $239 |
Radeon RX 480 4GB | June 2016 | Ellesmere | 2304 | 1266 | 5,834 | $199 |
Radeon RX 6500 XT | January 2022 | Navi 24 | 1024 | 2815 | 5,765 | $199 |
GeForce GTX Titan Black | February 2014 | GK110 | 2880 | 980 | 5,645 | $999 |
Radeon R9 290X | October 2013 | Hawaii | 2816 | 1000 | 5,632 | $549 |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | February 2019 | TU116 | 1536 | 1770 | 5,437 | $279 |
GeForce GTX 780 Ti | November 2013 | GK110 | 2880 | 928 | 5,345 | $699 |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | December 2019 | Navi 14 | 1408 | 1845 | 5,196 | $199 |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | December 2019 | Navi 14 | 1408 | 1845 | 5,196 | $169 |
Radeon R9 390 | June 2015 | Grenada | 2560 | 1000 | 5,120 | $329 |
Radeon HD 6990 | March 2011 | Antilles (2x) | 3072 | 830 | 5,100 | $699 |
Radeon RX 570 8GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2048 | 1244 | 5,095 | $199 |
Radeon RX 570 4GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2048 | 1244 | 5,095 | $169 |
GeForce GTX 1660 Tremendous | October 2019 | TU116 | 1408 | 1785 | 5,027 | $229 |
GeForce GTX 980 | September 2014 | GM204 | 2048 | 1216 | 4,981 | $549 |
Radeon RX 470 4GB | August 2016 | Ellesmere | 2048 | 1206 | 4,940 | $179 |
GeForce GTX 1660 | March 2019 | TU116 | 1408 | 1725 | 4,858 | $219 |
Radeon R9 290 | November 2013 | Hawaii | 2560 | 947 | 4,849 | $399 |
GeForce GTX Titan | February 2013 | GK110 | 2688 | 876 | 4,709 | $999 |
Radeon HD 5970 | November 2009 | Hemlock (2x) | 3200 | 725 | 4,640 | $599 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | July 2016 | GP106 | 1280 | 1708 | 4,372 | $249 |
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Version | June 2012 | Tahiti | 2048 | 1050 | 4,301 | $500 |
GeForce GTX 780 | Might 2013 | GK110 | 2304 | 900 | 4,147 | $649 ($499) |
Radeon R9 280X | August 2013 | Tahiti | 2048 | 1000 | 4,096 | $299 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Tremendous | November 2019 | TU116 | 1280 | 1590 | 4,070 | $159 |
Radeon R9 380X | November 2015 | Tonga | 2048 | 970 | 3,973 | $229 |
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | August 2016 | GP106 | 1152 | 1708 | 3,935 | $199 |
GeForce GTX 970 | September 2014 | GM204 | 1664 | 1178 | 3,920 | $329 |
Radeon R9 380 | June 2015 | Tonga | 1792 | 970 | 3,476 | $199 |
Radeon R9 280 | March 2014 | Tahiti | 1792 | 933 | 3,344 | $249 |
GeForce GTX 770 | Might 2013 | GK104 | 1536 | 1085 | 3,333 | $399 ($329) |
Radeon R9 285 | September 2014 | Tonga | 1792 | 918 | 3,290 | $249 |
GeForce GTX 680 | March 2012 | GK104 | 1536 | 1058 | 3,250 | $500 |
Radeon HD 7870 XT | November 2012 | Tahiti | 1536 | 975 | 2,995 | $270 |
GeForce GTX 1650 | April 2019 | TU117 | 896 | 1665 | 2,984 | $149 |
Radeon HD 7950 | January 2012 | Tahiti | 1792 | 800 | 2,867 | $450 |
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 | April 2020 | TU117 | 896 | 1590 | 2,849 | $149 |
Radeon HD 5870 | September 2009 | Cypress | 1600 | 850 | 2,720 | $379 |
Radeon HD 6970 | December 2010 | Cayman | 1536 | 880 | 2,703 | $369 |
Radeon R9 270X | August 2013 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1050 | 2,688 | $199 |
GeForce GTX 760 Ti | September 2013 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | OEM |
GeForce GTX 670 | Might 2012 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | $400 |
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | August 2012 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | $300 |
Radeon RX 560 4GB | Might 2017 | Baffin | 1024 | 1275 | 2,611 | $99 |
Radeon R9 370X | August 2015 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1000 | 2,560 | $179 |
Radeon HD 7870 | March 2012 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1000 | 2,560 | $350 |
GeForce GTX 590 | March 2011 | 2x GF110 | 1024 | 607 | 2,486 | $699 |
GeForce GTX 960 | January 2015 | GM206 | 1024 | 1178 | 2,413 | $199 |
Radeon HD 4870 X2 | August 2008 | 2x RV770 | 1600 | 750 | 2,400 | $449 |
GeForce GTX 760 | June 2013 | GK104 | 1152 | 1033 | 2,380 | $249 |
Radeon R9 270 | November 2013 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 925 | 2,368 | $179 |
Radeon HD 6950 2GB | December 2010 | Cayman | 1408 | 800 | 2,253 | $299 |
Radeon HD 6950 1GB | December 2010 | Cayman | 1408 | 800 | 2,253 | $259 |
Radeon RX 460 4GB | August 2016 | Baffin | 896 | 1200 | 2,150 | $139 |
Radeon RX 460 2GB | August 2016 | Baffin | 896 | 1200 | 2,150 | $109 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | October 2016 | GP107 | 768 | 1392 | 2,138 | $139 |
Radeon RX 560 4GB | October 2017 | Baffin | 896 | 1175 | 2,106 | $99 |
Radeon HD 5850 | September 2009 | Cypress | 1440 | 725 | 2,088 | $259 |
Radeon HD 6870 | October 2010 | Barts | 1120 | 900 | 2,016 | $239 |
Radeon HD 4850 X2 | November 2008 | 2x RV770 | 1600 | 625 | 2,000 | $339 |
Radeon R9 370 | June 2015 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 975 | 1,997 | $149 |
GeForce GTX 660 | September 2012 | GK106 | 960 | 1032 | 1,981 | $230 |
Radeon R7 260X | August 2013 | Bonaire | 896 | 1100 | 1,971 | $139 |
GeForce GTX 1050 | October 2016 | GP107 | 640 | 1518 | 1,943 | $109 |
Radeon R7 265 | February 2014 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 925 | 1,894 | $149 |
GeForce GTX 950 | August 2015 | GM206 | 768 | 1188 | 1,825 | $159 |
Radeon HD 7790 | March 2013 | Pitcairn | 896 | 1000 | 1,792 | $150 |
Radeon HD 5830 | February 2010 | Cypress | 1120 | 800 | 1,792 | $239 |
Radeon HD 7850 | March 2012 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 860 | 1,761 | $250 |
Radeon R7 360 | June 2015 | Bonaire | 768 | 1050 | 1,613 | $109 |
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Enhance | March 2013 | GK106 | 768 | 1032 | 1,585 | $170 |
GeForce GTX 580 | November 2010 | GF110 | 512 | 772 | 1,581 | $499 |
Radeon R7 260 | December 2013 | Bonaire | 768 | 1000 | 1,536 | $109 |
Radeon RX 550 | April 2017 | Lexa | 640 | 1183 | 1,514 | $79 |
Radeon HD 6850 | October 2010 | Barts | 960 | 775 | 1,488 | $179 |
GeForce GTX 650 Ti | October 2012 | GK106 | 768 | 928 | 1,425 | $150 |
GeForce GTX 570 | December 2010 | GF110 | 480 | 732 | 1,405 | $349 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | February 2014 | GK107 | 640 | 1085 | 1,389 | $149 |
Radeon HD 6770 | April 2011 | Juniper | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $129 |
Radeon HD 5770 | October 2009 | Juniper | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $159 |
Radeon HD 4890 | April 2009 | RV790 | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $249 |
GeForce GTX 480 | March 2010 | GF100 | 480 | 701 | 1,346 | $499 |
Radeon HD 6790 | April 2011 | Barts | 800 | 840 | 1,344 | $149 |
GeForce GTX 560 Ti (448 Core) | November 2011 | GF110 | 448 | 732 | 1,312 | $289 |
Radeon HD 7770 | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 640 | 1000 | 1,280 | $160 |
GeForce GTX 560 Ti | January 2011 | GF114 | 384 | 822 | 1,263 | $249 |
Radeon HD 4870 | June 2008 | RV770 | 800 | 750 | 1,200 | $299 |
GeForce GT 1030 (GDDR5) | Might 2017 | GP108 | 384 | 1468 | 1,127 | $70 |
GeForce GTX 750 | February 2014 | GK107 | 512 | 1085 | 1,111 | $119 |
GeForce GTX 470 | March 2010 | GF100 | 448 | 608 | 1,090 | $349 |
GeForce GTX 560 | Might 2011 | GF114 | 336 | 810 | 1,089 | $199 |
GeForce GT 1030 (DDR4) | March 2018 | GP108 | 384 | 1379 | 1,059 | $79 |
Radeon HD 3870 X2 | January 2008 | 2x R680 | 640 | 825 | 1,056 | $449 |
Radeon HD 6750 | January 2011 | Juniper | 720 | 700 | 1,008 | OEM |
Radeon HD 5750 | October 2009 | Juniper | 720 | 700 | 1,008 | $129 |
Radeon HD 4850 | June 2008 | RV770 | 800 | 625 | 1,000 | $199 |
Radeon HD 4770 | April 2009 | RV740 | 640 | 750 | 960 | $109 |
Radeon R7 350 | February 2016 | Cape Verde | 512 | 925 | 947 | $89 |
Radeon HD 7750 (GDDR5) | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 512 | 900 | 922 | $110 |
Radeon HD 7750 (DDR3) | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 512 | 900 | 922 | $110 |
GeForce GTX 460 (256-bit) | July 2010 | GF104 | 336 | 675 | 907 | $229 |
GeForce GTX 460 (192-bit) | July 2010 | GF104 | 336 | 675 | 907 | $199 |
GeForce GTX 465 | Might 2010 | GF100 | 352 | 608 | 856 | $279 |
GeForce GTX 560 SE | February 2012 | GF114 | 288 | 736 | 848 | OEM |
Radeon R7 250E | December 2013 | Cape Verde | 512 | 800 | 819 | $109 |
GeForce GTX 650 | September 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 1058 | 813 | $110 |
Radeon R7 250 (GDDR5) | August 2013 | Oland | 384 | 1050 | 806 | $99 |
Radeon R7 250 (DDR3) | August 2013 | Oland | 384 | 1050 | 806 | $89 |
Radeon HD 6670 (GDDR5) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 800 | 768 | $109 |
Radeon HD 6670 (DDR3) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 800 | 768 | $99 |
GeForce 9800 GX2 | March 2008 | 2x G92 | 256 | 1500 | 768 | |
GeForce GT 740 (GDDR5) | Might 2014 | GK107 | 384 | 993 | 763 | $99 |
GeForce GT 740 (DDR3) | Might 2014 | GK107 | 384 | 993 | 763 | $89 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE | November 2010 | GF104 | 288 | 650 | 749 | $160 |
Radeon HD 4830 | October 2008 | RV770 | 640 | 575 | 736 | $130 |
GeForce GT 640 (GDDR5) | April 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 950 | 730 | OEM |
GeForce GT 730 (64-bit, GDDR5) | June 2014 | GK208 | 384 | 902 | 693 | $79 |
GeForce GT 730 (64-bit, DDR3) | June 2014 | GK208 | 384 | 902 | 693 | $69 |
GeForce GTX 550 Ti | March 2011 | GF116 | 192 | 900 | 691 | $149 |
Radeon HD 6570 (GDDR5) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 650 | 624 | $89 |
Radeon HD 6570 (DDR3) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 650 | 624 | $79 |
Radeon HD 5670 | January 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 775 | 620 | $99 |
Radeon HD 7730 (GDDR5) | April 2013 | Cape Verde | 384 | 800 | 614 | $60 |
Radeon HD 7730 (DDR3) | April 2013 | Cape Verde | 384 | 800 | 614 | $60 |
GeForce GT 640 (DDR3) | April 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 797 | 612 | OEM |
GeForce GTS 450 | September 2010 | GF106 | 192 | 783 | 601 | $129 |
GeForce GTX 295 | January 2009 | 2x GT200 | 480 | 576 | 553 | $500 |
Radeon HD 5570 (GDDR5) | February 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 650 | 520 | $80 |
Radeon HD 5570 (DDR3) | February 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 650 | 520 | $80 |
GeForce GT 545 (GDDR5) | Might 2011 | GF116 | 144 | 870 | 501 | OEM |
Radeon R7 240 | August 2013 | Oland | 320 | 780 | 499 | $69 |
Radeon HD 3870 | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 777 | 497 | $349 |
Radeon HD 4670 | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 750 | 480 | $79 |
Radeon HD 2900 XT | Might 2007 | R600 | 320 | 743 | 476 | $399 |
GeForce GTS 250 | March 2009 | G92b | 128 | 1836 | 470 | $150 |
GeForce 9800 GTX+ | July 2008 | G92b | 128 | 1836 | 470 | |
GeForce 9800 GTX | April 2008 | G92 | 128 | 1688 | 432 | |
Radeon HD 3850 (512MB) | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $189 |
Radeon HD 3850 (256MB) | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $179 |
Radeon HD 3830 | April 2008 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $129 |
Radeon HD 4650 (DDR3) | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 650 | 416 | |
GeForce 8800 GTS (512MB) | December 2007 | G92 | 128 | 1625 | 416 | |
GeForce GT 545 (DDR3) | Might 2011 | GF116 | 144 | 720 | 415 | $149 |
Radeon HD 4650 (DDR2) | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 600 | 384 | |
Radeon HD 2900 Professional | September 2007 | R600 | 320 | 600 | 384 | $300 |
GeForce 8800 Extremely | Might 2007 | G80 | 128 | 1500 | 384 | |
Radeon HD 5550 (GDDR5) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 |
Radeon HD 5550 (DDR3) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 |
Radeon HD 5550 (DDR2) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 |
GeForce 8800 GTX | November 2006 | G80 | 128 | 1350 | 346 | |
GeForce GT 630 (DDR3) | April 2012 | GK107 | 192 | 875 | 336 | OEM |
GeForce 9800 GT | July 2008 | G92a/G92b | 112 | 1500 | 336 | |
GeForce 8800 GT (512MB) | October 2007 | G92 | 112 | 1500 | 336 | |
GeForce 8800 GT (256MB) | December 2007 | G92 | 112 | 1500 | 336 | |
GeForce GTX 285 | January 2009 | GT200 | 240 | 648 | 311 | $400 |
GeForce GT 630 (GDDR5) | Might 2012 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $80 |
GeForce GT 440 (GDDR5) | February 2011 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $100 |
GeForce GT 440 (GDDR3) | February 2011 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $100 |
GeForce GTX 275 | April 2009 | GT200 | 240 | 633 | 304 | $250 |
GeForce GTX 280 | June 2008 | GT200 | 240 | 602 | 289 | $650 ($430) |
Radeon HD 2900 GT | November 2007 | R600 | 240 | 600 | 288 | $200 |
GeForce GT 730 (128-bit, DDR3) | June 2014 | GF108 | 96 | 700 | 269 | $69 |
GeForce GT 530 | Might 2011 | GF118 | 96 | 700 | 269 | OEM |
GeForce GT 430 | October 2010 | GF108 | 96 | 700 | 269 | $79 |
GeForce 9600 GSO | Might 2008 | G92 | 96 | 1375 | 264 | |
GeForce 8800 GS | January 2008 | G92 | 96 | 1375 | 264 | |
GeForce GT 240 (GDDR5) | November 2009 | GT215 | 96 | 1340 | 257 | OEM |
GeForce GT 240 (DDR3) | November 2009 | GT215 | 96 | 1340 | 257 | OEM |
GeForce GTX 260 | September 2008 | GT200 | 216 | 576 | 249 | $300 |
Radeon HD 6450 | April 2011 | Caicos | 160 | 750 | 240 | $55 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (640MB) | November 2006 | G80 | 96 | 1188 | 228 | |
GeForce 8800 GTS (320MB) | February 2007 | G80 | 96 | 1188 | 228 | |
GeForce GTX 260 | June 2008 | GT200 | 192 | 576 | 221 | $400 ($270) |
GeForce 9600 GT | February 2008 | G94 | 64 | 1625 | 208 | |
Radeon R5 230 | April 2014 | Caicos | 160 | 625 | 200 | |
Radeon HD 2600 XT | June 2007 | RV630 | 120 | 800 | 192 | $149 |
Radeon HD 3650 (DDR3) | January 2008 | RV635 | 120 | 725 | 174 | |
Radeon HD 3650 (DDR2) | January 2008 | RV635 | 120 | 725 | 174 | |
GeForce GT 520 | April 2011 | GF119 | 48 | 810 | 156 | $59 |
Radeon HD 2600 Professional | June 2007 | RV630 | 120 | 600 | 144 | $99 |
GeForce GT 220 (DDR3) | October 2009 | GT216 | 48 | 1360 | 131 | OEM |
GeForce GT 220 (DDR2) | October 2009 | GT216 | 48 | 1335 | 128 | OEM |
Radeon HD 5450 | February 2010 | Cedar | 80 | 650 | 104 | $50 |
Radeon HD 4550 | September 2008 | RV710 | 80 | 600 | 96 | |
Radeon HD 4350 | September 2008 | RV710 | 80 | 600 | 96 | |
GeForce 8600 GTS | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1450 | 93 | |
GeForce 9500 GT (GDDR3) | July 2008 | G96 | 32 | 1400 | 90 | |
GeForce 9500 GT (DDR2) | July 2008 | G96 | 32 | 1400 | 90 | |
GeForce 8600 GT (GDDR3) | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1188 | 76 | |
GeForce 8600 GT (DDR2) | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1188 | 76 | |
GeForce GT 420 | September 2010 | GF108 | 48 | 700 | 67 | OEM |
Radeon HD 2400 XT | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 650 | 52 | $55 |
GeForce 9400 GT | August 2008 | G96 | 16 | 1400 | 45 | |
Radeon HD 2400 Professional | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 525 | 42 | |
Radeon HD 2300 | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 525 | 42 | |
GeForce 8600 GS | April 2007 | G84 | 16 | 1180 | 38 | |
Radeon X1950 XTX * | October 2006 | R580+ | 48 | 650 | 31.2 * | $449 |
Radeon X1900 XTX * | January 2006 | R580 | 48 | 650 | 31.2 * | $649 |
Radeon X1950 XT * | October 2006 | R580+ | 48 | 625 | 30.0 * | |
Radeon X1900 XT * | January 2006 | R580 | 48 | 625 | 30.0 * | $549 |
GeForce 8500 GT | April 2007 | G86 | 16 | 900 | 29 | |
GeForce 8400 GS | June 2007 | G86 | 16 | 900 | 29 | |
GeForce 7950 GX2 * | June 2006 | 2x G71 | 48 | 500 | 24.0 * | |
GeForce 9300 GS | June 2008 | G98 | 8 | 1400 | 22 | |
GeForce 9300 GE | June 2008 | G98 | 8 | 1300 | 21 | |
Radeon X1950 Professional * | October 2006 | RV570 | 36 | 575 | 20.7 * | |
Radeon X1900 GT * | Might 2006 | R580 | 36 | 575 | 20.7 * | |
Radeon X1950 GT * | January 2007 | RV570 | 36 | 500 | 18.0 * | |
GeForce 7900 GTX * | March 2006 | G71 | 24 | 650 | 15.6 * | |
GeForce 7900 GTO * | October 2006 | G71 | 24 | 650 | 15.6 * | |
GeForce 8300 GS | July 2007 | G86 | 8 | 900 | 14 | |
GeForce 7950 GT * | September 2006 | G71 | 24 | 550 | 13.2 * | |
GeForce 7800 GTX (512MB) * | November 2005 | G70 | 24 | 550 | 13.2 * | |
Radeon X1650 XT * | October 2006 | RV560 | 24 | 525 | 12.6 * | |
GeForce 7900 GT * | March 2006 | G71 | 24 | 450 | 10.8 * | |
GeForce 7800 GTX (256MB) * | June 2005 | G70 | 24 | 430 | 10.3 * | |
Radeon X1800 XT * | October 2005 | R520 | 16 | 625 | 10.0 * | $549 |
Radeon X1650 GT * | Might 2007 | RV560 | 24 | 400 | 9.6 * | |
GeForce 7900 GS * | Might 2006 | G71 | 20 | 450 | 9.0 * | |
Radeon X850 XT Platinum * | December 2004 | R480 | 16 | 540 | 8.6 * | |
Radeon X850 XT * | December 2004 | R480 | 16 | 520 | 8.3 * | |
Radeon X800 XT Platinum * | Might 2004 | R423 | 16 | 520 | 8.3 * | |
Radeon X800 XT * | December 2004 | R423 | 16 | 500 | 8.0 * | |
Radeon X1800 XL * | October 2005 | R520 | 16 | 500 | 8.0 * | |
GeForce 7800 GT * | August 2005 | G70 | 20 | 400 | 8.0 * | |
Radeon X1650 Professional * | August 2006 | RV535 | 12 | 600 | 7.2 * | |
Radeon X1600 XT * | October 2005 | RV530 | 12 | 590 | 7.1 * | |
GeForce 7600 GT * | March 2006 | G73 | 12 | 560 | 6.7 * | |
Radeon X800 XL * | December 2004 | R430 | 16 | 400 | 6.4 * | |
GeForce 6800 Extremely * | June 2004 | NV45 | 16 | 400 | 6.4 * | |
Radeon X850 Professional * | December 2004 | R480 | 12 | 507 | 6.1 * | |
Radeon X1800 GTO * | March 2006 | R520 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 * | $249 |
Radeon X1600 Professional * | October 2005 | RV530 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 * | |
Radeon X1300 XT * | August 2006 | RV530 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 * | |
GeForce 7800 GS * | February 2006 | G70 | 16 | 375 | 6.0 * | |
Radeon X800 Professional * | Might 2004 | R423 | 12 | 475 | 5.7 * | |
GeForce 6800 GT * | June 2004 | NV45 | 16 | 350 | 5.6 * | |
GeForce 6800 GS (PCIe) * | November 2005 | NV42 | 12 | 425 | 5.1 * | |
Radeon X800 GTO (256MB) * | September 2005 | R423/R480 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 * | |
Radeon X800 GTO (128MB) * | September 2005 | R423/R480 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 * | |
GeForce 7600 GS * | March 2006 | G73 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 * | |
Radeon X800 * | December 2004 | R430 | 12 | 392 | 4.7 * | |
GeForce 6800 GS (AGP) * | December 2005 | NV40 | 12 | 350 | 4.2 * | |
GeForce 6600 GT * | November 2004 | NV43 | 8 | 500 | 4.0 * | |
GeForce 6800 * | November 2004 | NV41/NV42 | 12 | 325 | 3.9 * | |
Radeon X800 GT * | December 2005 | R423/R480 | 8 | 475 | 3.8 * | |
Radeon X800 SE * | October 2004 | R420 | 8 | 425 | 3.4 * | |
Radeon X700 Professional * | December 2004 | RV410 | 8 | 425 | 3.4 * | |
Radeon 9800 XT * | September 2003 | R360 | 8 | 412 | 3.3 * | |
Radeon X700 * | September 2005 | RV410 | 8 | 400 | 3.2 * | |
Radeon 9800 Professional * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 380 | 3.0 * | |
GeForce 7300 GT (GDDR3) * | Might 2006 | G73 | 8 | 350 | 2.8 * | |
GeForce 7300 GT (DDR2) * | Might 2006 | G73 | 8 | 350 | 2.8 * | |
Radeon 9800 SE (128-bit) * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
Radeon 9800 * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
Radeon 9700 Professional * | July 2002 | R300 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
GeForce 6800 XT * | September 2005 | NV42 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
GeForce 6800 LE * | January 2005 | NV41/NV42 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
Radeon X1300 Professional * | October 2005 | RV515 | 4 | 600 | 2.4 * | |
GeForce 6600 (128-bit) * | August 2004 | NV43 | 8 | 300 | 2.4 * | |
Radeon 9700 * | October 2002 | R300 | 8 | 275 | 2.2 * | |
Radeon 9500 Professional * | October 2002 | R300 | 8 | 275 | 2.2 * | |
GeForce 7300 GS * | January 2006 | G72 | 4 | 550 | 2.2 * | |
Radeon X600 XT * | September 2004 | RV380 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
Radeon X1550 * | January 2007 | RV516 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
Radeon 9600 XT * | September 2003 | RV360 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
GeForce FX 5800 Extremely * | January 2003 | NV30 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
GeForce FX 5950 Extremely * | October 2003 | NV38 | 4 | 475 | 1.9 * | |
GeForce FX 5700 Extremely * | October 2003 | NV36 | 4 | 475 | 1.9 * | |
GeForce FX 5900 Extremely * | Might 2003 | NV35 | 4 | 450 | 1.8 * | |
GeForce FX 5700 * | October 2003 | NV36 | 4 | 425 | 1.7 * | |
Radeon X600 Professional * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 * | |
Radeon X600 Professional * | September 2004 | RV380 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 * | |
Radeon X600 * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 * | |
Radeon 9600 Professional * | March 2003 | RV350 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 * | |
GeForce FX 5900 XT * | December 2003 | NV35 | 4 | 390 | 1.6 * | |
GeForce FX 5900 * | Might 2003 | NV35 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 * | |
GeForce FX 5800 * | January 2003 | NV30 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 * | |
GeForce FX 5600 Extremely * | March 2003 | NV31 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 * | |
Radeon 9800 SE (256-bit) * | March 2003 | R350 | 4 | 380 | 1.5 * | |
GeForce 7300 LE * | March 2006 | G72 | 4 | 350 | 1.4 * | |
GeForce 6200 TurboCache * | December 2004 | NV44 | 4 | 350 | 1.4 * | |
Radeon 9600 SE * | September 2003 | RV350 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 * | |
Radeon 9600 * | September 2003 | RV350 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 * | |
GeForce FX 5600 * | March 2003 | NV31 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 * | |
GeForce FX 5200 Extremely * | March 2003 | NV34 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 * | |
GeForce 6600 LE * | June 1905 | NV43 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 * | |
Radeon X300 SE * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 * | |
GeForce 6200 * | October 2004 | NV43 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4800 * | January 2003 | NV28 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4600 * | February 2002 | NV25 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 * | |
Radeon 9500 * | October 2002 | R300 | 4 | 275 | 1.1 * | |
Radeon 8500 * | August 2001 | R200 | 4 | 275 | 1.1 * | |
GeForce FX 5500 * | March 2004 | NV34B | 4 | 270 | 1.1 * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4800 SE * | January 2003 | NV28 | 4 | 275 | 1.1 * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4400 * | February 2002 | NV25 | 4 | 275 | 1.1 * | |
Radeon X1050 (128-bit) * | December 2006 | RV350 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
Radeon 9550 * | January 2004 | RV350 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
Radeon 9250 * | March 2004 | RV280 | 4 | 240 | 1.0 * | |
Radeon 9200 * | April 2003 | RV280 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
Radeon 9100 * | April 2003 | R200 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
Radeon 9000 * | August 2002 | RV250 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
GeForce FX 5700 LE * | March 2004 | NV36 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
GeForce FX 5200 (64-bit) * | March 2003 | NV34 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
GeForce FX 5200 (128-bit) * | March 2003 | NV34 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4200 * | April 2002 | NV25 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
GeForce 3 Ti500 * | October 2001 | NV20 | 4 | 240 | 1.0 * | |
GeForce 2 Extremely * | August 2000 | NV16 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
GeForce 2 Ti * | October 2001 | NV15 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
GeForce 7200 GS * | January 2006 | G72 | 2 | 450 | 0.9 * | |
Radeon X300 * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 * | |
Radeon 9200 SE * | March 2003 | RV280 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 * | |
GeForce 3 * | February 2001 | NV20 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 * | |
GeForce 2 GTS * | April 2000 | NV15 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 * | |
GeForce 3 Ti200 * | October 2001 | NV20 | 4 | 175 | 0.7 * | |
Radeon 7500 * | August 2001 | RV200 | 2 | 290 | 0.6 * | |
GeForce 4 MX460 * | February 2002 | NV17 | 2 | 300 | 0.6 * | |
GeForce 4 MX440 * | February 2002 | NV17 | 2 | 275 | 0.6 * | |
Rage Fury MAXX * | October 1999 | 2x ATI Rage | 4 | 125 | 0.5 * | |
GeForce 4 MX420 * | February 2002 | NV17 | 2 | 250 | 0.5 * | |
GeForce 256 SDR * | October 1999 | NV10 | 4 | 120 | 0.5 * | |
GeForce 256 DDR * | December 1999 | NV10 | 4 | 120 | 0.5 * | |
GeForce 2 MX400 * | March 2001 | NV11 | 2 | 200 | 0.4 * | |
GeForce 2 MX200 * | March 2001 | NV11 | 2 | 175 | 0.4 * | |
Rage 128 Extremely * | August 1999 | ATI Rage | 2 | 130 | 0.3 * | |
Rage 128 Professional * | August 1999 | ATI Rage | 2 | 125 | 0.3 * | |
Radeon SDR * | June 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.3 * | |
Radeon LE * | Might 2001 | R100 | 2 | 150 | 0.3 * | |
Radeon DDR * | April 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.3 * | |
Radeon 7200 SDR * | June 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.3 * | |
Radeon 7200 DDR * | April 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.3 * | |
Nvidia Riva TNT2 Extremely * | March 1999 | NV5 | 2 | 150 | 0.3 * | |
Nvidia Riva TNT2 Professional * | October 1999 | NV5 | 2 | 143 | 0.3 * | |
Nvidia Riva TNT2 * | March 1999 | NV5 | 2 | 125 | 0.3 * | |
Rage 128 GL * | August 1998 | ATI Rage | 2 | 103 | 0.2 * | |
Radeon 7000 * | February 2001 | RV100 | 1 | 183 | 0.2 * | |
Nvidia Riva TNT * | June 1998 | NV4 | 2 | 90 | 0.2 * | |
Nvidia Riva 128 * | August 1997 | NV3 | 1 | 100 | 0.1 * |
* – Denotes efficiency measured in gigaoperations per second, versus GFLOPS. Older GPU architectures with out unified shader assist aren’t instantly comparable with newer architectures.
Discovering Reductions on the Greatest Graphics Playing cards
With all of the GPU shortages as of late, you are unlikely to see big gross sales on a graphics card, however you might discover some financial savings by testing the newest Newegg promo codes, Greatest Purchase promo codes and Micro Heart coupon codes.
For much more data, take a look at our Graphics Card Purchaser’s Information.
MORE: Greatest Graphics Playing cards for Gaming
MORE: Graphics Card Energy Consumption Examined
MORE: Easy methods to Stress-Check Graphics Playing cards (Like We Do)
MORE: CPU Benchmarks
Need to touch upon this story? Tell us what you assume within the Tom’s {Hardware} Boards.